Search
01/12/2022
The Metaverse in Urology: Ready for Prime Time. The ESUT, ERUS, EULIS, and ESU Perspective
Checcucci, E, Cacciamani, GE, Amparore, D, Gozen, A, Seitz, C, Breda, A, Liatsikos, E, Porpiglia, F. The Metaverse in Urology: Ready for Prime Time. The ESUT, ERUS, EULIS, and ESU Perspective. European Urology Open Science. 2022; 46DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.011. PMID:36388430. IF:2.500(Q3/6D).
28/11/2022
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children: Evolution, Current Status, and Future Trends
Quiroz, Y, Somani, BK, Tanidir, Y, Tekgul, S, Silay, S, Castellani, D, Lim, EJ, Fong, KY, Garcia, E, Corrales, M, Hameed, BMZ, Llorens, E, Teoh, JYC, Dogan, HS, Traxer, O, Tur, AB, Gauhar, V. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Children: Evolution, Current Status, and Future Trends. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. 2022; 36(12)DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0160. PMID:35972727. IF:2.700(Q2/5D).
01/11/2022
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo (TM) robot-assisted surgery system
Sarchi, L, Mottaran, A, Bravi, CA, Paciotti, M, Farinha, R, Piazza, P, Puliatti, S, De Groote, R, De Naeyer, G, Gallagher, A, Breda, A, Mottrie, A. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy feasibility and setting with the Hugo (TM) robot-assisted surgery system. BJU INTERNATIONAL. 2022; 130(5)DOI:10.1111/bju.15819. PMID:35689414. IF:4.500(Q1/3D).
01/11/2022
Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature
Ripa, F, Tokas, T, Griffin, S, Ferretti, S, Tur, AB, Somani, BK. Role of Pediatric Ureteral Access Sheath and Outcomes Related to Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation: A Systematic Review of Literature. European Urology Open Science. 2022; 45DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012. PMID:36267473. IF:2.500(Q3/6D).
01/11/2022
Accuracy of the CUETO, EORTC 2016 and EAU 2021 scoring models and risk stratification tables to predict outcomes in high-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer
Krajewski, W, Aumatell, J, Subiela, JD, Nowak, L, Tukiendorf, A, Moschini, M, Basile, G, Poletajew, S, Malkiewicz, B, Del Giudice, F, Maggi, M, Chung, BI, Cimadamore, A, Galosi, AB, Delle Fave, RF, D'Andrea, D, Shariat, SF, Hornak, J, Babjuk, M, Chorbinska, J, Teoh, JYC, Muilwijk, T, Joniau, S, Tafuri, A, Antonelli, A, Panunzio, A, Alvarez-Maestro, M, Simone, G, Mastroianni, R, Laszkiewicz, J, Lonati, C, Zamboni, S, Simeone, C, Niedziela, L, Candela, L, Macek, P, Contieri, R, Hidalgo, BG, Rivas, JG, Sosnowski, R, Mori, K, Mir, C, Soria, F, Gonzalez-Padilla, DA, Faba, OR, Palou, J, Ploussard, G, Rajwa, P, Halon, A, Laukhtina, E, Pradere, B, Tully, K, Burgos, FJ, Cidre, MAJ, Szydelko, T. Accuracy of the CUETO, EORTC 2016 and EAU 2021 scoring models and risk stratification tables to predict outcomes in high-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS. 2022; 40(11)DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.008. PMID:35851185. IF:2.700(Q2/5D).
01/11/2022
Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)
Gonzalez, ST, Rosito, TE, Tur, AB, Ruiz, J, Gozalbez, R, Maiolo, A, Tavares, PM, Gorgen, ARH, de Kencht, EL, Madarriaga, YQ, Weller, S, Tobia, IP, Castellan, M, Corbetta, JP. Multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). International Braz J Urol. 2022; 48(6)DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0194. PMID:36083265. IF:3.700(Q1/3D).
21/10/2022
Follow-up care of 12 months of patients with bladder cancer in Spain: A multicenter prospective cohort study
Bonfill, X, Martinez-Zapata, MJ, Barrionuevo-Rosas, L, Vernooij, RWM, Sanchez, MJ, Morales-Suarez-Varela, M, De la Cruz, J, Emparanza, JI, Ferrer, M, Pijoan, JI, Palou, J, Frances, A, Madrid, E, Coscia, C, Zamora, J. Follow-up care of 12 months of patients with bladder cancer in Spain: A multicenter prospective cohort study. MEDICINE. 2022; 101(42)DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000031175. PMID:36281169. IF:1.600(Q3/8D).
04/10/2022
How Reliable Is Endoscopic Stone Recognition? A Comparison Between Visual Stone Identification and Formal Stone Analysis
Henderickx, MMEL, Stoots, SJM, De Bruin, DM, Wijkstra, H, Freund, JE, Wiseman, OJ, Ploumidis, A, Skolarikos, A, Somani, BK, Sener, TE, Emiliani, E, Dragos, LB, Villa, L, Talso, M, Daudon, M, Traxer, O, Kronenberg, P, Doizi, S, Tailly, T, Tefik, T, Hendriks, N, Beerlage, HP, Baard, J, Kamphuis, GM. How Reliable Is Endoscopic Stone Recognition? A Comparison Between Visual Stone Identification and Formal Stone Analysis. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY. 2022; 36(10)DOI:10.1089/end.2022.0217. PMID:35651279. IF:2.700(Q2/5D).